|
View to the performance shell that functions as the visual icon for the park. |
Recently
I had posted an article from The Architect's Newspaper about innovative design projects in which Architecture and Landscape Architecture combined in new and innovative ways. One of the interesting projects in the article was Central Park by the Office of James Burnett in Playa Vista, and, as promised, here are some photos and thoughts on the unique and engaging park.
(Editor's note: As I was crafting my write-up, Archinet published a nice review of the park, including some great images. Interestingly, we had some similar feelings about the public-private nature of the park.)
The verdict? Central Park is a new, contemporary park full of promise and dynamic design moves, but suffering right now from something (mostly) out of its control: It is a park without people. The feeling after visiting it three or four times is akin to an empty house or a high-design piece of furniture placed behind glass - it is beautiful, striking, but incomplete without its use and users.
Completed in the summer of 2010, the park sits at the eastern end of the Playa Vista development, bordered on the north by a new contemporary commercial development, but surrounded on all other sides by graded, empty plots waiting for eventual completion of the far-reaching Playa Vista Development. The park itself is comprised of both bold and subtle design moves that create a rich experience for those that are able to find it. The park is broken into three primary activity sectors: active recreation facilities such as a soccer field, basketball court, and Noguchi-esque play areas comprise the western third of the site; an amphitheater flanked by Oak allee strolling gardens and bocce ball courts sit in the center of the park; and a naturalistic stream and reflection pond bookend a playful garden composed of large, angular berms planted with drifts of accents plants on the eastern third of the site. Geometric bands of trees and pathways run across and diagonally through the site, creating strong circulation and site lines on the site, eventually extruding into the series of angular, engineered berms on the eastern edge of the park.
Beyond the groundplane geometries and bold berms, the designers spent a lot of consideration on massaging grades on the site to not only manage topography and drainage but separate functions in small, but meaningful ways. The most noticeable is the sloping amphitheater with the bisecting circulation path (akin to a romantic haha wall) that allows people to traverse the park without being seen. However, gestures such as lowering the synthetic turf soccer field to help contain activities and retain water, and elevating a sand play area for small children away from foot traffic also create significant experiential gains in the park.
Environmentally, the park also showcases a contemporary ethos. The drought-tolerant, largely native or near-native plant palette is entirely irrigated with graywater (as is all of Playa Vista), and the amenities double as habitat providers. Some birds from the nearby Pacific Ocean and Ballona Wetlands are already beginning to colonize the water features.
As is true of all new open spaces in park-starved Los Angeles, early colonizers are soccer players both during the week and weekends. However, passive users, and casual visitors to the park are either absent or few and far between. In part, this is a result of the hidden nature of the park (it is not visible from any nearby streets, nor highly publicized), but also from the tenuous nature of privately developed, public access parks such as Central Park. While the park is open to the public, it was developed by private owners and sits on private land, dictating a different set of concerns and liabilities. The result is a long list of rules restricting use of the park and a highly-present group of security guards tasked with protecting the park. While undoubtedly this security has prevented the park from disuse, graffiti, and other forms of human entropy, it clearly engenders a feeling that you are not welcome at this park, especially in larger groups (On visits by myself I had no problems, but on a visit taking 15 students from a landscape architecture program to see the park's design I was questioned extensively by security before we could tour the park.) The result is a park that wants to be used, but isn't being used yet, despite the carefully designed spaces found within.
Other implementation issues of lesser, and perhaps more typical, degree of a large-scale, recently completed project are also present. At my last visit in March, at least 4 or 5 Oak trees had failed on the site, potentially due to issues with standing water or drainage. Also, as a park exploring new design ideas, some are destined to work great, while it appears others may potentially prove short-lived. For instance, low groundcovers were planted beneath the Oaks in organic geometries to promote a circuituous, modern strolling garden, but are already struggling to establish properly, and will likely fail due to trampling. Also, the long-term health and stability of the berms will be interesting to observe, if nothing else because their form seems so dependent upon engineering that may degrade over time.
Overall, Central Park is an impressive project, both in its scope and execution, and is full of rich ideas for designers and visitors. Not only does it create a number of distinct and carefully constructed spaces, but an obvious financial commitment and dedication to customization by the client and project team has a created a park with a unique and compelling identity. Now all it needs are the people the project deserves.
|
Concept Rendering of Park. Image from Archinect All Rights Reserved. |
|
View own circulation spine towards berm garden.
|
|
View down circulation spine from the playful berm garden. |
|
Redwood allee and horseshoe area |
|
Western entry plaza with depression and extrusion |
|
Oak Allee |
|
View to the sunken soccer field
|
|
Contemporary play area recalls a Noguchi playground |
|
View of the reflecting pond and seating. |
|
Stepping stone path across riparian feature.
|
|
Stepping stone detail across riparian feature |
|
Geometric strolling garden that may not survive use |
|
One of the dead oaks on site. |
|
View to sports facilities across pond with island tree plantings. |
|
Custom Ipe seating elements provide vantage points for the geometrically planted berms. |
|
Detailed view of Berms planted with succulent and grass mix |
|
Custom seating element echos the topographic moves on site |
|
Custom seating and planter |
|
Star Jasmine covers a custom fence surrounding the performance space. |
|
Integrated signage detailing
|